Kære Læser
Denne uges SkatteMail er meget omfattende, dels fordi Folketinget har vedtaget nye skattelove inden deres sommerferie, dels på grund af en række nyheder fra EU og udlandet.
God læselyst
Flemming L. Bach
Artikler og interessante links
Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin: 2 - 2016
Skat på smartphones mv.
Gule plader eller papegøjeplader
Højesteretsdom tilsidesætter SKAT’s fortolkning af søtransportbegrebet i sømandsbeskatningslovens § 10
Bulletin for International Taxation: 5 - 2016
Indberetning af ratepensioner og ophørende alderspensioner
Tax Shifts in EU-Member States: The Growing Impact of (Shifting) Recommendations by the European Commission on National Tax Policy
The Proposal for an EU Anti-avoidance Directive: Some Preliminary Thoughts
How Does the CJEU's Case Law on Cross-Border Loss Relief Apply to Cross-Border Mergers and Divisions?
The Automatic Exchange of Tax Information and the Protection of Personal Data in the European Union: Reflections on the Latest Jurisprudential and Normative Advances
The Switch-Over Provision in the Proposal for an Anti-tax Avoidance Directive and Its Compatibility with the EU Treaty Freedoms
BEPS and Transfer Pricing but What about VAT and Customs?
European Taxation: 5 - 2016
Fuld omkostningsgodtgørelse til selskaber og fonde
Afgørelse om fradrag for lønudgifter ved opkøb af bankvirksomhed
The EU Anti Tax Avoidance Package: Moving Ahead of BEPS?
Institutional Hybrid Financial Instruments and Double Non-taxation under Domestic Rules and Tax Treaty Law: The Example of Spain
The Quest for a New Corporate Taxation Model and for an Effective Fight against International Tax Avoidance within the EU
BEPS Action 7: Evaluation of the Agency Permanent Establishment
Tax Considerations for the European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy
Conflict of Source versus Residence-Based Taxation in India with Reference to Fees for Technical Service
Financial Budget for 2016/2017: Has India Put Its BEPS Foot Forward?
Recent Developments in the Dutch Loss Carry Over Restrictions for Holding and Intercompany Financing Entities
Transfer Pricing: An Overview of the Italian Supreme Court's Recent Rulings
Nyt fra Energi & Forsyning maj 2016
Ny forlænget frist for allokering af acontoskat ved etablering af ny sambeskatning
Dom fra Vestre Landsret kan have stor betydning for fradrag for udenlandske kildeskatter
Kan jeg fratrække tab på et lån til en tidligere samlever?
Styresignaler
Ændring af praksis - tilladelse til tilbagefordeling af børne- og ægtefællebidrag mv. - styresignal
Bindende svar
Fast driftssted af ombygningsarbejde på to skibe
Russisk investeringsfond anset for transparent
Skattekredit - bortseelse fra underskud - lempelse
Banklån med renteloft - gæld - renteudgifter
Grænseoverskridende fusion - danske filialer - underskudsbegrænsning
Ikke offentliggjorte afgørelser
Nyt fra SKAT
Nye vejledninger mv.
Lovstof
Nyt fra Lovtidende
Nyt fra Folketinget
Vedtagne lovforslag
Nye dokumenter vedrørende lovforslag
Nye dokumenter vedrørende almindelig del
SELECT * FROM Appeller WHERE(([SkatteraadChanged] >= '20160530' AND [SkatteraadChanged] <= '20160605') OR ([LSRChanged] >= '20160530' AND [LSRChanged] <= '20160605') OR ([ByretChanged] >= '20160530' AND [ByretChanged] <= '20160605') OR ([LandsretChanged] >= '20160530' AND [LandsretChanged] <= '20160605') OR ([HojesteretChanged] >= '20160530' AND [HojesteretChanged] <= '20160605')) ORDER BY AppelId DESC
Dato | Angivelse | Periode |
10-06-2016 | A-skat mv. for små og mellemstore virksomheder i 2016 | Maj 2016 |
Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin (APTB)Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin: 2 - 2016 I denne udgave:
|
BDONæsten 500.000 danskere betaler skat af fri telefon, som formentlig er det mest udbredte personalegode. Og i næsten 36.000 husstande har både mand og kone fri telefon og nyder derfor godt af den særlige ægtefællerabat. |
BDOGule plader eller papegøjeplader Der bliver flere og flere varebiler på papegøjeplader. Blandt andet fordi mange tror, at de kan undgå firmabilbeskatning, når de kører i en varebil på de særlige hvid-gule plader, men det kan man sjældent. |
Bech-BruunHøjesteret har i en dom afsagt den 27. maj 2016 tilsidesat SKATs fortolkning af søtransportbegrebet i sømandsbeskatningslovens § 10. |
Bulletin for International Taxation (BIT)Bulletin for International Taxation: 5 - 2016 I denne udgave:
|
Dansk RevisionIndberetning af ratepensioner og ophørende alderspensioner Da SKAT har konstateret, at der i nogle tilfælde er indskudt mere end maksimumsbeløbet for 2015 på ratepensioner og ophørende alderspensioner, kan årsopgørelsen ikke frigives for de personer det omfatter. SKAT har derfor vedtaget en straksprocedure for behandling af disse sager via telefonisk henvendelse. |
DLA PiperNyt fra Energi & Forsyning maj 2016 Bliv opdateret på seneste nyt inden for energi og forsyning i vores seneste nyhedsbrev. |
EC Tax ReviewAuthors: Bruno Peeters, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Law, Research Group Business & Law. |
EC Tax ReviewThe Proposal for an EU Anti-avoidance Directive: Some Preliminary Thoughts On 28 January 2016, the European Commission made public a package of measures aimed to tackle tax avoidance and abusive practices in the European internal market. The package includes a detailed proposal for a new European Union (EU) Anti-avoidance Directive addressing six main issues: deductibility of interest; exit taxation; switch-over clause; General Anti-avoidance Rule (GAAR); Controlled Foreign Corporation (CFC) rules; and hybrid mismatches. This article provides a critical analysis of the Proposal for a Directive taking into consideration some of the implications of its implementation at stake. The final aim of this work is to contribute some elements that can improve the future debate on these matters. |
EC Tax ReviewThe common system of taxation laid down in the Merger Directive does not require Member States to give cross-border loss relief further to a cross-border merger or division, and allows previously deducted permanent establishment losses to be recaptured upon a cross-border restructuring. This article analyses the CJEU’s case law in A Oy and Commission v. UK, and attempts to define under which circumstances cross-border loss relief can be claimed on the basis of primary EU law. In addition, the author examines which conclusions can be drawn from the recent CJEU judgments in Nordea Bank and Timac Agro for cross-border mergers and divisions, i.e., if the recapture rule of Article 10(1) paragraph 2 of the Merger Directive is compatible with Article 49 TFEU. |
EC Tax ReviewIn this article, we examine from the perspective of the fundamental right to protection of personal data, the main problems derived from the generalization of the automatic exchange of tax information and, more specifically, the treatment of this issue in Directive 2011/16 EU on administrative cooperation in the tax area in its original text and after the changes incurred to date to promote the automatic exchange of information at the community level. The study is based mainly on the opinions of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and the latest EU Court of Justice’s case law. |
EC Tax ReviewIn this article, the author discusses the switch-over provision for shareholders of low-taxed entities in third countries in the proposal for an Anti-tax Avoidance Directive. She discusses some policy aspects and subsequently assesses whether the measure is in accordance with the EU Treaty Freedoms. |
EC Tax ReviewBEPS and Transfer Pricing but What about VAT and Customs? Authors: Martijn Schippers, Member of the Customs Team of EY, The Netherlands. |
European Taxation (ET)I denne udgave:
|
EYFuld omkostningsgodtgørelse til selskaber og fonde Skatteministeriet offentliggjorde den 3. maj 2016 den nye Retssikkerhedspakke II - "Borgeren skal stå stærkere". I retssikkerhedspakken stilles der blandt andet forslag om, at der skal indføres en sagsbehandlingsgaranti for de mest almindelige klagesager fra små og mellemstore virksomheder, og så skal der igen indføres fuld omkostningsgodtgørelse for selskaber og fonde. |
EYAfgørelse om fradrag for lønudgifter ved opkøb af bankvirksomhed Østre Landsret har den 1. juni 2016 afsagt dom i to sager om fradrag for lønudgifter ved opkøb af bankvirksomhed. I afgørelserne når Landsretten frem til, at der ikke er fradrag for sådanne udgifter, men også at dette er udtryk for en praksisændring. |
IntertaxThe EU Anti Tax Avoidance Package: Moving Ahead of BEPS? Authors: Ana Paula Dourado, Professor of the University of Lisbon; Member for the EU Platform on Tax Good Governance. |
IntertaxAttention has been paid to double non-taxation resulting from contractual hybrid financial instruments, which are instruments that share debt and equity features in their very design. This article focuses on a specific Institutional Hybrid Financial Instrument instead. Institutional Hybrid Financial Instruments are equity instruments that could equally lead to conflicts of qualification and double non-taxation considering certain level of legal deductibility from a tax perspective according to a tax policy decision. The analysis deals with the application of the Spanish exemption method to Brazilian Juros sobre o Capital Próprio from a domestic law and tax treaty perspective. Moreover, the implementation of linking rules and its implications regarding hybrid financial instruments are also under consideration. |
IntertaxThe European Commission’s Action Plan for a Fair and Efficient Tax System within the EU, and the subsequent ‘Anti-Tax Avoidance Package’ (ATAP), set out a number of short-term initiatives aimed at achieving an optimal corporate tax system and at fighting international tax avoidance within the EU. Pending the desired introduction of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) as a long-term goal, these initiatives have been considered as capable of stabilizing Member States’ revenues and of allowing corporate taxation where profits are really generated. Since specific suggestions made in the academic literature – namely, the suggestions for a ‘destination-based corporation tax’, for a ‘corporation tax 2.0’ and for a ‘new common consolidated tax base’ – have the same objectives, this article critically discusses these suggestions and it analyses whether they can be considered as more consistent or as less consistent with the common objectives than the Commission’s initiatives. It also elaborates the hypothesis for a solution capable of both collecting the key input offered by these suggestions and being complementary to the CCCTB. |
IntertaxBEPS Action 7: Evaluation of the Agency Permanent Establishment The article is devoted to one of the most controversial items of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)-Project – Action 7, particularly the agency Permanent Establishment (PE) of Articles 5(5) and 5(6). Marking the threshold for source-state taxing rights, the PE has been at the centre of an entrenched debate since the concept’s emergence in the nineteenth century. Thus, working on the agency PE the OECD soon found itself caught between a rock and a hard place. With strong national interest for a high threshold on the one side and the increasing need to rebalance taxing rights due to globalization and the emergence of modern business models on the other side. This conflict shaped the consolations process and final output of Action 7. Ultimately, the Final Report settled for much less than the initially pursued globally supported holistic approach. The need for a substantial reform, however, remains and becomes more pressing with the introduction of unilateral measures. Moreover, with the agency PE in the spotlight, attention will inevitably be directed to the attribution of profits, an issue neglected in the BEPS Project. The inadequacies of the current attribution rules are examined in the second part of this article and a proposal is put forward. |
IntertaxTax Considerations for the European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy In this article, the authors analyse the EU concept of the Digital Single Market from an Indirect Tax and Direct Tax perspective. The analysis will focus on the current status quo and will discuss the recently proposed EU plans to design robust Indirect Tax and Direct Tax rules, as well as regulations for the future. The authors propose ideas and solutions that can be taken into account by the Commission and various stakeholders in an open debate to optimize the legislation for all parties involved. These ideas share the same common ground for Indirect Tax and Direct Tax. Where deemed necessary, the authors include Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) initiatives as well. |
IntertaxHighly internationalized trade and commerce, in wake of globalization, is a contemporary reality. However, the increasing porosity of national boundaries has not changed the fact that every country has the sovereign right to tax income accruing, arising or received in it, on account of activities carried on in its territory. Yet, an important change with internationalization is that increasingly there are more than one sovereign nation entitled to claim ‘right to tax’. This sovereign right to impose tax, as is well known, can be exercised by either the country from where the income is sourced (source country) or the country where the taxpayer resides (residence country). However, in current times, where it is common for individuals or businesses to have activities connected to two or more than two countries, exercise of this ‘right to tax’ by each nation has given rise to a complex situation of individuals or business entities being faced with the problem of being subjected to the rigors of double taxation. The concept of ‘residence jurisdiction’ and ‘source jurisdiction’ are two fundamental concepts in the domain of International Taxation. While conflict between these two concepts of taxation is a problem in the international arena, interestingly in India, this preference for one over the other has been a bone of contention between legislature and judiciary of the country. While judiciary has been showing preference for ‘residence jurisdiction’, the legislature has been in favour of a regime based on the concept of ‘source jurisdiction’. This article explains the contours of this conflict as played out between the legislature and the judiciary in India. While endorsing the idea of tilt towards ‘source jurisdiction’ as a more appropriate regime for a developing country like India, this article argues that the need of the day is for taxation regime which contains adequate mixture of elements from both ‘residence jurisdiction’ and ‘source jurisdiction’. |
IntertaxFinancial Budget for 2016/2017: Has India Put Its BEPS Foot Forward? This article analyses the first attempt made by the Indian government, through the Finance Budget of 2016–2017, to implement the measures proposed under the OECD / G 20 BEPS Action Plan released on 5 October 2015. It closely examines the Equalization Levy, a unilateral measure that has been taken by the Indian government to address Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) in the digital economy, from an international tax perspective. It also analyses the constitutionality of this levy. Further, it examines issues relating to the legal protection of the confidentiality of information reported under the Country-by-Country Reporting requirements as adopted in India. The impact of other measures, including the newly introduced test of residency for companies and the rationalization of certain tax rates through the Finance Budget of 2016–2017, have also been examined in light of the objectives of the BEPS Action Plan. |
IntertaxBased on Dutch tax law, losses resulting from holding and financing activities are ring-fenced in such a way that these losses can only be offset against profits derived from similar activities. Recently, two developments took place with regard to those rules. First, the Dutch tax law was changed in reaction on a verdict of the Dutch Supreme Court. Second, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled a verdict that could have an impact on the rules. In this article, the authors describe those developments and they discuss the current scope of the relevant Dutch legislation. |
IntertaxTransfer Pricing: An Overview of the Italian Supreme Court's Recent Rulings Rulings on transfer pricing matters issued in the last few years by Italian Courts covered various themes. Among these, the Tax Authorities frequently challenged the selection and application of transfer pricing methods, comparability analyses developed by taxpayers supporting intercompany policies, the analysis of special transactions such as intercompany loans and services as well as transactions related to intangibles. The lack of a frame of reference, on the one hand, and the (perceived) uncertainty of the subject, on the other hand, engendered difficulties as to the crafting of a uniform jurisprudential orientation, leading Judges oftentimes to settle disputes through a line of reasoning, not always consistent with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD’s) arm’s length principle. |
PwCNy forlænget frist for allokering af acontoskat ved etablering af ny sambeskatning Folketinget har den 12. maj 2016 vedtaget et lovforslag, der bl.a. forlænger fristen for at anmode om omkontering af acontoskatter ved ny koncernetablering. Ligeledes forlænges fristen for den indberetning, som virksomhederne skal foretage for at kunne tage fradrag for kontant betalte udgifter til køb af varer mv. |
PwCDom fra Vestre Landsret kan have stor betydning for fradrag for udenlandske kildeskatter Vestre Landsret har den 1. april 2016 afsagt en principiel dom om ligningslovens § 33 F, som kan have stor betydning for, hvor stort et fradrag man fremover kan tage for udenlandske kildeskatter på fx renter og royalties. |
Ret&Råd AdvokaterKan jeg fratrække tab på et lån til en tidligere samlever? Ja, det har du kunnet lige siden januar 2010 ifølge kursgevinstlovens § 14. Tab på lån til samlevere, søskende, andre ”ikke-nære” familiemedlemmer og venner kan fradrages. Men.. |
Vedrører: Ligningsloven § 10 og § 11
SKAT ændrer med dette styresignal sin praksis for tilladelse til tilbagefordeling således, at der også kan gives tilladelse til tilbagefordeling til de indkomstår, som børne- og ægtefællebidragene vedrører, når betalingen først sker i et senere indkomstår. Tilsvarende gælder for de særlige børnebidrag i anledning af konfirmation og dåb.
Vedrører: Selskabsskatteloven § 2, stk. 1, litra a. Dobbeltbeskatningsoverenskomsten mellem Danmark og Tyskland art, 5.3. Momsloven § 14, stk. 1, nr. 3 Momsloven § 16, stk. 1 Momsloven § 34, stk. 1, nr. 7 og § 46, stk. 1, nr. 2 og 3 samt stk. 3. Momsforordningens art. 11, stk. 1-3
Skatterådet bekræftede, at de beskrevne aktiviteter med ombygning af to skibe medfører et fast driftssted i Danmark for spørger, jf. art. 5, 3 i den dansk-tyske dobbeltbeskatningsoverenskomst. Skatterådet bekræftede, at spørgers aktiviteter i forhold til de beskrevne projekter ikke medførte, at spørger kunne anses som etableret i Danmark i momsmæssig forstand, jf. momslovens § 16, stk. 1 og § 46, stk. 1, nr. 2. Skatterådet bekræftede også, at det momsmæssige leveringssted for de ydelser, som leveredes til spørgeren om bord på de to skibe ikke lå i Danmark.
Vedrører: Aktieavancebeskatningsloven § 4 A og § 4 B. Selskabsskatteloven § 1, stk. 1 nr. 2, og § 13, stk. 1, nr. 2
Skatterådet fandt ikke, at en russisk investeringsfond skulle anses for et selvstændigt skattesubjekt efter danske skatteregler med den virkning, at det danske moderselskab kunne oppebære skattefrie udbytter fra investeringsfonden i henhold til selskabsskattelovens § 13, stk. 1, nr. 2, jf. selskabsskattelovens § 1, stk. 1, nr. 2. Der blev herved særligt henset til, at den russiske investeringsfond ikke har selvstændige ledelsesorganer eller organer, der fuldt ud kunne sidestilles hermed.
Vedrører: Ligningsloven § 8 X og § 33 H
Skatterådet kunne ikke bekræfte, at selskabet A ved at se bort fra underskud i Danmark, jf. ligningslovens § 33 H, for at opnå lempelse for den betalte udenlandske skat, fortsat ville kunne opnå skattekredit efter ligningslovens § 8 X.
Vedrører: Kursgevinstloven § 1, stk. 1, nr. 2, § 25, stk. 1, 29 og § 33, stk. 1. Statsskatteloven § 6, stk. 1, litra e
Skatterådet fandt, at et prioritetslån med variabel rente og renteloft skulle anses for en gæld for debitor, således at gevinst og tab medtages ved opgørelsen af den skattepligtige indkomst efter realisationsprincippet. Derudover fandt Skatterådet, at der var fradrag for renteudgifter sammensat af en basisrente og et rentetillæg.
Vedrører: Fusionsskatteloven § 2, § 5, stk. 1 og 3, § 8, stk. 6 og § 15, stk. 3 Selskabsskatteloven § 2, § 7 og § 31, stk. 1 og 2
Skatterådet kunne bekræfte, at en skattefri fusion efter fusionsskattelovens § 15, stk. 3, mellem et britisk selskab og et irsk selskab ikke udløste dansk beskatning i det britiske selskabs danske filial. Skatterådet kunne ligeledes bekræfte, at den skattefri fusion hverken ville udløse dansk beskatning i det ophørende britiske selskab eller i det fortsættende irske selskab. Endelig kunne Skatterådet bekræfte, at skattemæssige fremførselsberettigede underskud pr. 31. december 2015 i det britiske selskabs danske filial ville fortabes som følge af fusionen.
Hjemmel
Fusionsskatteloven § 2 Fusionsskatteloven § 5, stk. 1 og 3 Fusionsskatteloven § 8, stk. 6 Fusionsskatteloven § 15, stk. 3 Selskabsskatteloven § 2 Selskabsskatteloven § 7 Selskabsskatteloven § 31, stk. 1 og 2
SKAT ændrer med dette styresignal sin praksis for tilladelse til tilbagefordeling således, at der også kan gives tilladelse til tilbagefordeling til de indkomstår, som børne- og ægtefællebidragene vedrører, når betalingen først sker i et senere indkomstår. Tilsvarende gælder for de særlige børnebidrag i anledning af konfirmation og dåb.
Høringssvar:
Journalnr: 15/0043201
Ekstraordinær genoptagelse af skatteansættelsen og fradrag
Klagen vedrører ekstraordinær genoptagelse af skatteansættelsen og fradrag for befordring, børnebidrag og renteudgifter. Landsskatteretten stadfæster afgørelsen.
Afsagt: 25-04-2016
Journalnr: 14/4186472
Ejendomsavance
Sagen vedrører et bindende svar om skattepligt af avancen ved salg af en ejendom. Landsskatteretten stadfæster afgørelsen.
Afsagt: 25-04-2016
Journalnr: 14/4340733
Skat af fri bolig og fri jagt
Klagen vedrører beskatning af fri bolig og fri jagt. Landsskatteretten stadfæster afgørelsen.
Afsagt: 25-04-2016
Journalnr: 14/4340757
Skat af fri bolig og fri jagt
Klagen vedrører beskatning af fri bolig og fri jagt. Landsskatteretten nedsætter forhøjelsen til nul.
Afsagt: 25-04-2016
om globaliseringens indvirkning på arbejdstageres skattetryk
om harmonisering af sanktionerne som led i bekæmpelsen af skatteunddragelse
Referat
Referat fra møde i IT-følgegruppen d. 31. marts 2016
Bekendtgørelse om ændring af bekendtgørelse om visse regler i pensionsafkastbeskatningsloven
Bekendtgørelse om ændring af bekendtgørelse om indberetningspligter m.v. efter skattekontrolloven
Spm. 39 | Spm. om kommentar til henvendelsen af 26/5-16 fra Nordea Invest, til skatteministeren |
Spm. 40 |
Spm. 41 | Spm. om ministerens kommentar til henvendelsen af 31/5-16 fra Jyske Bank, til skatteministeren |
Spm. 36 | Spm. om kommentar til henvendelsen af 26/5-16 fra KPMG Acor Tax, til skatteministeren |
Bilag 211 |
Spm. 297 | Spm., om bevillingerne til SKAT i 2015 og 2016, til skatteministeren Svar |
Spm. 401 | Spm. om at beregne effekten på den strukturelle offentlige saldo m.v., til skatteministeren Svar |
Spm. 438 |
Spm. 446 |
Spm. 459 | Spm. om ministerens talepapir fra samrådet den 7/4-16 om udbytteskat, til skatteministeren Svar |
Spm. 462 |
Spm. 463 |
Spm. 464 |
Spm. 465 |
Spm. 466 |
Spm. 479 |
Spm. 480 |
Spm. 481 |
Spm. 482 |
Spm. 483 |
Spm. 484 |
Spm. 485 |
Spm. 486 |
Spm. 487 |
Spm. 488 |
Spm. 489 |
Spm. 490 |
Spm. 491 |
Spm. S 1184 |
Spm. S 1185 |